search the sitedownloadshow tocontact usmake a film in 48 hoursmake a bad film make a film for under £200 write a scriptformat a scriptget paid for writing a scriptdraw a storyboardcast a filmdirect a filmedit a filmlicense musicget a bbfc certificate make a fool of yourselfmake a blue moviecheat at pokerwin on the gee-geeshold a bad partybe a gigolomake a cup of teaask adampoetry pageword/headunderground book reviewthe blaineratordead ideasshowreelsmobile cinemasite map
|
Charlie Productions : How To Make A Bad Film
Obviously the ways in which it is possible to make a film that is less than good are legion. Making a good film is very hard, making anything less than good is less hard to achieve. Of course there are exceptions to this. Making a film as bad "Revolver" takes special effort and it almost certainly would have been easier to make a better film than this even if you first took the precaution of blinding yourself.
However at least the faults of a uniquely bad film are unique. Far too often we get sent scripts or even finished films that are just plain bad. Lazily bad. Ordinarily bad. If you are about to make a film and you find yourself following some of the examples below then please, for all sakes, think twice...
Theme and Genre.
Genre Theory deals with the preconceptions that an audience is given by a filmmaker. Someone in control of their subject matter will use the subtle tics and tells of a genre to quickly guide an audience to an understanding of the narrative, they will also use their understanding of the genre to subvert the audience's expectation and lead them to a new and interesting imaginative space. Genre is the art of playing with what the audience already knows. So, one of the most direct routes to a making a bad film is simply to force feed the audience a heavy diet of what they already knew, and nothing else. My favourites are that both Child Abuse and Racism are Wrong.
Obviously subtler themes and generic images can be just as tedious, happy fat people, wise and caring whores, faceless security guards who cannot shoot straight, the Eiffel Tower being in Paris and the hero being related to the villain - but nothing is quite as remarkable to the bad filmmaker as the fact that it is wrong to touch children or be nasty to black people. Short film makers seem especially hung up about explaining these two astounding and only recently understood truths. If you are trying (and some people out there really seem to be trying) to make a bad short film then nothing hits the mark better than a film that exists to explain, yet again, that we are, beneath our skin, all the same. All of us. Well, apart from abused kids, whom lazy film logic dictates will grow up to abuse in their turn, ad infinitum and ad naseum. Why are you making this film? Do you really imagine that there are racists and child abusers out there who would be OK if only they saw your film? That guy who firebombs the Asian owned 24-hour store and then goes home and kicks his daughter down the stairs - do you think he's going to see your short film and suddenly pale and think "Oh my God, I've been a bit of bastard haven't I?" Or are you making this film because it confirms for you that you are a good person who knows that being bad is wrong and all the other good people you know will nod sagely and feel unable to criticise the tired, uninformed, unhelpful, regurgitation of trite simplicities that pass as a script. Technically that last sentence should end with a question mark but I'm not giving it one because that's not a question, not even rhetorically, that's just a statement of what you are doing. So stop it.
Overall though the key thing about using Genre Theory to make a bad film is to think of a genre and stick blindly, graspingly, uncomprehendingly to it's rules. Horror films are especially easy to copy and especially boring to watch. The sci-fi-kung-fu-time-travel-detective-action-adventure may seem too varied to really be a genre all of it's own, but the rules are quite clear (a man, or better, a woman in a bra, does some fighting, then it ends) and astonishingly repetitive and banal to watch. You get the picture, though, when thinking about something derivative to make, spare a thought for the art house muse on sexual fidelity. By relying on overlong wide shots, abstract imagery, sudden cutting to seemingly unrelated events, acoustic guitar and/or drum and bass soundtracks and long scenes of improvised dialogue (preferably delivered naked, or better, naked and uncomfortable about the fact) you can really feel like you're making something unique and powerful, whilst all the time doing nothing but churn out a series of cliches about men being masculine and women being less so (or perhaps the other way around, a startling thought that could take up the entire last act) whilst, hopefully, seeing a bit of minge.
That said, the bad filmmaker can make brave steps by taking a genre and twisting it just ever so slightly in a way that proves that they really have no understanding of what they're doing. A good example of this is the Gangster Film with the added twist that it's Written By A Posh Boy And Set In A Place Where There Are No Gangsters! Few things are more gobsmackingly awful than watching men in jet black M&S suits strolling through the mean streets of Canterbury, York, or any other provincial cathedral city. The tragic rise in UK gun crime does not stop it still being utterly laughable when you have a shoot out by Reading train station. Another classic example of the take on a genre that really is too original is the Serial Killer film. Inspired by Thomas Harris' shocking Hannibal Lecter novels, driven by an uncomprehending admiration for Fincher's "Se7ven", what could be better than a gut wrenching tale of two hard bitten cops on the trail of a Norfolk based serial murderer whose victims all form clues to his identity so convoluted they read like an insane dyslexic trying to write a cryptic crossword. "Wait a minute guv, she was killed using a claw hammer, perhaps that's a reference to the Hammer series of horror films" "Or, Constable, it's a reference to MC HAMMER the famous baggy trousered rapper, rapper is, after all, only one letter away from Ripper as in Jack the Ripper!" "Good God boss, no one in the Banningham area is safe!"
One last special mention must go to the Genre of "Films About Making Films", which is unique in that no one has ever made a good one. People may tell you that Truffaut's "La Nuit American" is a brilliantly funny film about the ups and downs of making a film. It's not. It's rubbish. It's obvious, self-indulgent and not very funny. Now think about this - Truffaut made that. He is a great film maker who probably, though I could be wrong, but probably, knows more about making films than you ever will. Yet, still, his version of what it is like to make films really is astonishingly boring and achingly smug. Just think how much worse a film about making films will be when made by people who haven't really ever made a film. Just think how bad it will be when you do it.Besides, we did that a couple of years back and our film was stretching a point to cover the whole of film making in ten minutes. Don't get me wrong, our film is good - but ten minutes really is enough.
Casting.
Of course making a film that is fundamentally tired, ludicrous, lazy or insipid is not the only way to make a bad film. Indeed, it may not even be enough. If you are honest with yourself the proper three Star Wars films are actually just as daft as the latest ones, the only difference being that in Harrison Ford and Carrie Fisher, Lucas accidentally managed to cast two people with charisma. Not a mistake he has repeated. However, when making a bad film, it is important to remember that a good actor can actually make almost any tosh at least half watchable. I mean, you would have thought that casting Orlando Bloom as an heroic blacksmith would have been enough to sink Pirates of The Caribbean but you can always watch Johnny Depp. No matter how self-indulgent his performance, despite his habit of only appearing in utterly terrible films, nothing can ever be that bad if Johnny Depp is in it. He's like Humphrey Bogart, even his bad films at least have him in them.
So what can the bad filmmaker do about the power of the actor to rescue their otherwise catatonic material? Well obviously most bad filmmakers will never get to work with Johnny Depp, though this is not a blanket rule. Equally though, most bad filmmakers won't get to work with Orlando Bloom, which is a shame because he is able to kill a good film stone dead with just a single look. No look is unfair. Look implies that the person has an object that their gaze is focused on, something that has taken their attention. Orlando would never do that to you.
Still, for those of us unable to spend vast sums of money to get someone to ruin your film there are cheaper alternatives. Cheapest of all - your friends. Now by friends I don't mean the actors you work with who have become part of your social circle. I don't even mean the people you went to school with who are now studying at Lamda. Or even Mountview. Or even the Poor School (though we're getting warm). No, I mean your friends. Lets call them John, Gary and Cathy. John is your best mate, he's not exactly a wow with women 'cos he's very dull and can only talk about his job and Arsenal football club but he's really nice and quite clean. He can't lie, he doesn't even like being the focus of attention, but you know, surely that gives him an Everyman sort of quality? Gary isn't really a friend as such, he's that guy from the pub who always shouts out the funny answer during the pub quiz. When he heard that you made films he grinned and said "What, blue movies is it? Ehy? Serious? I'll be in it. No serious actually, I've always wanted to do a bit of acting, I mean not just porn but like proper stuff. No serious man..."
Finally there is Cathy. Now remember, when casting for a bad film the only thing you need to look for in an actress is whether she is pretty or not. Cathy isn't but she used to act. In musicals. At school. Her main aim is to look glamourous and beautiful, and, as the director of a bad film, your main duty is to constantly try and make her look sexy. This locks the pair of you in a wonderful subtextual battle... she suggests a dressing gown, you suggest a t-shirt and knickers, you both compromise on a vast stripy smock. Throughout the entire process she lays out her boundaries and you ignore them. The end result is uncomfortable, confusing and often sublimely bizarre. Cathy climbs from the car tugging self-consciously at the hem of her mini-skirt, beside her is John holding a gun and looking slightly worried, like a man who can't quite remember if he left the milk bottles out. Enter Gary in a vest and dark glasses. An unconvincing fight ensues... later, Cathy will relate an almost entirely improvised story about the death of both her parents, whilst having a bath, wrapped in a towel.
No that wasn't as funny as I could have made it. It wasn't funny watching it either. Feel my pain.
Charlie Productions believe passionately in doing things and always trying to stop in
time for tea.
Brook House Design Studios, Bluebridge Road, Brookmans
Park, Herts AL9 7SX admin | sitemap | fresh look media
|